WHEN IS THE LAW WHAT IT IS, AND WHEN IS IT WHAT IT OUGHT TO BE? – A TALE OF TWO JUDGMENTS

May 22, 2023
|Law Everyday

WHEN IS THE LAW WHAT IT IS, AND WHEN IS IT WHAT IT OUGHT TO BE? – A TALE OF TWO JUDGMENTS

The morning of 16 May 2023 was no ordinary morning. For me, it was a busy one because I had conciliation at the office of the Labour Commissioner, but it got a lot busier when I got out to find social
media abuzz with news from the courts. I quickly found out that the Supreme Court had handed down judgment in Digashu v GRN, Seiler-Lilles v GRN (SA 7-2022 and SA 6-2022) [2023] NASC, and the . . .

Dear user, unfortunately you are not allowed to view this restricted content.
Please Login or Register in order to view.

+264 813814414

info@consultfasz.com

WHEN IS THE LAW WHAT IT IS, AND WHEN IS IT WHAT IT OUGHT TO BE? – A TALE OF TWO JUDGMENTS

Important Links

Just In

WHEN IS THE LAW WHAT IT IS, AND WHEN IS IT WHAT IT OUGHT TO BE? – A TALE OF TWO JUDGMENTS

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – ARTICLE 81 – DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT (STARE DECISIS). Digashu v GRN, Seiler-Lilles v GRN NASC (16 May 2023)

CRIMINAL LAW – MURDER; LAW OF EVIDENCE – EVALUATION OF – SELECTIVE ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF THE SAME WITNESS’S EVIDENCE IN THE ABSENCE OF OTHER COMPELLING EVIDENCE JUSTIFYING SUCH COURSE IS IMPERMISSIBLE. S v Madisia NAHCMD (16 May 2023)