CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION; APPEAL AGAINST SETENCE – TRIAD FACTORS CONSIDERED; LEGAL REPRESENTATION – SEQUENCE OF EXPLANATION OF RIGHTS; DOCKET DISCLOSURE – FAILIURE BY COURT A QUO TO INFORM APPELLANTS OF RIGHTS; FINES – APPLICABLE GUIDELINES
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION; APPEAL AGAINST SETENCE – TRIAD FACTORS CONSIDERED;
LEGAL REPRESENTATION – SEQUENCE OF EXPLANATION OF RIGHTS; DOCKET DISCLOSURE – FAILIURE BY COURT A QUO TO INFORM APPELLANTS OF RIGHTS; FINES – APPLICABLE GUIDELINES
The appellants appeared in the Rundu Magistrate’s Court on charges of contravening section 4 (1)(d) read together with sections 1, 4 (2)(b), 8, 9, 12, 13 and 14 of the Controlled Wildlife Products and Trade Act No. 9 of 2008, as amended (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) – Importing anything from a Controlled Wildlife . . .
Dear user, unfortunately you are not allowed to view this restricted content.
Please Login or Register in order to view.