The applicant, acting as the deputy sheriff for the district of Windhoek, had attached movable property, specifically goods listed in the Interpleader Notice, in favor of the first claimant. However, the second claimant, who appeared in person during these proceedings, asserted his ownership of the same movable property. Notably, the first claimant acknowledged the second claimant's ownership of certain items from the list, which included a Defy Chest Freezer, a Hisense Flat-Screen TV, and a Black Leather 2-Seater Benedict Couch.
The central issue in these interpleader . . .