CIVIL PROCEDURE – APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION – STRONG INTERPLAY BETWEEN REASONABLE AND ACCEPTABLE EXPLANATION AND REASONABLE PROSPECTS OF SUCCESS REQUIRED. De Klerk v Penderis NO NASC.

The appellant, Mr. Marèn Brynard de Klerk, is an admitted legal practitioner in Namibia. Prior to the event that gave rise to the proceedings in the court a quo, the appellant was practicing as a legal practitioner and senior director and shareholder together with the 11th, 12th, and 13th respondents (‘the DHC respondents’) under the name and style of De Klerk, Horn and Coetzee Incorporated (DHC Incorporated), at Windhoek.

While practicing as such, the appellant was appointed by the Master of the High Court as executor of three estates, namely, estate late Mushimba, estate late Reviglio, and . . .

Dear user, unfortunately you are not allowed to view this restricted content.
Please Login or Register in order to view.