CIVIL PRACTICE – COMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDERS AND CONSEQUENCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE THEREOF
The applicant launched an urgent application which was heard on 18 March 2022 before another court. On 18 March 2022, the first respondent was ordered to inter alia, do everything necessary to partially remove the freeze in terms of section 6(2) (f) of the Banking Institutions Act of 2 of 1998, placed on the applicant’s account held with the third respondent in order for applicant to meet its necessary day-to-day business expenses. The applicant then launched another urgent . . .