
- July 18, 2023
- |Civil Law, Practice, And Procedure, Concise Law Reports (CLR)
The appellants (the Government) sought to set aside some orders granted by the High Court in favour of the respondents who are inmates at a correctional facility run in terms of the Correctional Service Act 9 of 2012 (the Act); while the second respondent (cross-appellant) cross-appealed the relief that was dismissed by the High Court. Amongst others, the cross-appellant had challenged the practice of placing handcuffs on inmates behind their backs while being transported; the practice of solitary confinement authorised under s 103 of the Act and reg 257 made thereunder; and the denial of contact visits . . .
Dear user, unfortunately you are not allowed to view this restricted content.
Please Login or Register in order to view.