• +264 813814414
  • info@consultfasz.com

The appellants (the Government) sought to set aside some orders granted by the High Court in favour of the respondents who are inmates at a correctional facility run in terms of the Correctional Service Act 9 of 2012 (the Act); while the second respondent (cross-appellant) cross-appealed the relief that was dismissed by the High Court. Amongst others, the cross-appellant had challenged the practice of placing handcuffs on inmates behind their backs while being transported; the practice of solitary confinement authorised under s 103 of the Act and reg 257 made thereunder; and the denial of contact visits . . .

Dear user, unfortunately you are not allowed to view this restricted content.
Please Login or Register in order to view.

error: Content is protected !!