• +264 813814414
  • info@consultfasz.com

This is a special plea of prescription raised by the defendants that the plaintiff’s claim prescribed for non-compliance with s 39(1) of the Act. The plaintiff, in the particulars of the claim, seeks payment of damages allegedly caused to his motor vehicle after a collision with a motor vehicle, GRN 986, driven by the second defendant while acting within the course and scope of his employment with the first defendant, plus interest and costs of suit.

The defendants contend that the plaintiff’s claim prescribed for non-compliance with s 39(1) of the Act, and further . . .

Dear user, unfortunately you are not allowed to view this restricted content.
Please Login or Register in order to view.

error: Content is protected !!